The Bitter Pill

•

The goal of this report is to map a social controversy related to emergency contraception, term that refers to all those contraception methods that can be used to prevent pregnancy within few days after unprotected intercourse, contraceptive failure or misuse (such as forgotten pills or torn condoms), rape or coerced sex. Our first analysis on data we got from the internet led us to concentrate on a specific type of American contraceptive pill: Plan B one Step. This was fostered by recent facts surrounding its commercialization and liberalization. As a matter of facts on June 20th of 2013, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced it has approved the use of Plan B One-Step as a nonprescription drug for all women of child-bearing potential. This action complied with the order of the U.S. District Court in New York to make “morning after pills” available as an over-the-counter product without age or point-of-sale restrictions. The removal of these restrictions made many actors emerge and get involved in the debate with different position and points of view toward the utter liberalization decision. The decision to focus on the United States was therefore made considering the evidence and amount of data related to Plan B one Step in respect with other pills and contraceptive methods, and also considering the cultural weigh USA has toward all other western and developing countries as well.

The research question developed to orient our analysis is "When young is too young to get morning after pill?". It was chosen considering the grown perplexity about no age restrictions, and all doubts, appeals, requests and protests concerning the righteousness of letting young people buy it autonomously. The aim of our report is not to give any answer or solution but to see how actors - no the web- responded to this issue.
The controversy analysis has been placed on the web and carried out thanks to developing Digital Methods, for the assumption that nowadays the Internet can be considered not just a source of information but a mirror of almost whole current society. The report describes phase by phase the out-and-out experiment we put in place applying the Controversy Mapping methods (developed by Bruno Latour) and it struggles to be as much scientific as possible.

Our report aims to show every face of the controversy and how it is active on the web, where and what actors are involved, their position toward the topic, how they relate, or not, with each other and eventually give an organized and manageable portrait of the situation.